The Reeves County Detention Complex burns on the morning of February 2, 2009.
County Clerk Dianne Florez noticed it first. Plumes of smoke were rising outside the small West Texas town of Pecos. The prison is burning again, she announced.
About a month and a half before, on December 12, 2008, inmates had rioted to protest the death of one of their own, Jesus Manuel Galindo, 32. When Galindos body was removed from the prison in what looked to them like a large black trash bag, they set fire to the recreational center and occupied the exercise yard overnight. Using smuggled cell phones, they told worried family members and the media about poor medical care in the prison and described the treatment of Galindo, who had been in solitary confinement since mid-November. During that time, fellow inmates and his mother, who called the prison nearly every day, had warned authorities that Galindo needed daily medication for epilepsy and was suffering from severe seizures in the security housing unit, which the inmates call the hole.
I arrived in Pecos on February 2, shortly after the second riot broke out. I had driven 200 miles east from El Paso through the northern reaches of the Chihuahuan desert.
This article has become a book!
Tom Barry
MIT / Cloth / $14.95 / September 2011
With the rise of the Tea Party and Governor-turned-presidential-candidate Rick Perry, the entire country may soon be following a Texas model of border security. In Border Wars, Tom Barry (2010 National Magazine Award finalist for public-interest reporting) documents the costs of that model: lives lost; families torn apart; billions of wasted tax dollars; vigilantes prowling the desert; and fiscal crises at every level of government.
Tweet
Tom Barry, Senior Policy Analyst at the Center for International Policy, is author of many books, including The Great Divide and Zapatas Revenge.
Joseph H. Carens, The Case for Amnesty
Robert Perkinson, Guarded Hope
Mary F. Katzenstein and Mary L. Shanley, No Further Harm
I'm sorely disappointed in how Obama has handled immigration. Basically, while the popular media are ignoring it and focusing on health care, Afghanistan, and breathless assurances of the end of the recession, he has allowed the most vulnerable members of American society to languish.
It is disgusting how little concern people have even for those who are here illegally. No papers != nonhuman. Sure, we've got our laws and disparate points of view, but you can't just lock people up and watch them die. You can't separate perfectly decent people from their families and claim that it is justified by some legal abstraction.
As Tom Barry explains, the web of county jails and private prisons under ICE contract are a source of profit for those who operate them. Sheriffs and politicians from New Jersey to Arizona have bolstered their law-and-order credentials by labeling and treating detainees as criminals. Abuse is common, sometimes deadly. As ICE’s report of October 6th states: “ICE relies primarily on correctional incarceration standards ... carrying criminal incarceration policies and practices into the arena of immigration detention.” The wording is mild, but the meaning clear. Immigration detainees are serving what amounts to prison terms without judicial due process, whereas immigration detention is, by law, part of a civil, not criminal, procedure.
While President Obama’s recent announcement of an overhaul was pleasant to hear, he can go only so far without sweeping changes, by Congress, to the Illegal Immigration and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. The 1996 legislation facilitates deportation by casting a wide net over the types of transgressions that can trigger removal, including traffic and trivial drug offenses for which a penalty has already been levied and served. It prescribes mandatory detention in many cases, prohibitively high bond in others. The law contains no provision for protecting the children it splits from their parents, even American-born children. Immigration judges are employees of the executive branch, not the judiciary, and access to the courts is tightly restricted. Detainees have no right to counsel, only the right to hire an attorney on their nickel while remaining exposed to ICE’s fickle impediments to effective legal representation.
The paradox of the system resides in the contrast between the remarkably rigid immigration statutes on the one hand and a lawless enforcement apparatus on the other. Lawless not in the sense of sheriffs and wardens acting illegally, but in that of a glaring absence of federal regulation of the sites where aliens are held in custody. The result is an American gulag with an average daily population of 32,000. This administration appears intent on correcting some of the damage implicit in placing administrative detainees in jails and penal colonies, although it will take much time and money to untangle an entrenched system and culture of abuse. It is up to Congress to repair the laws that permitted it in the first place.
yes, we a gulag! yes, we are birthing concentration camps because we push the issue of imigration out of mind and out of the justice system.
If anyone reading this does not fear the power and corruption of government (federal bureaucracies and local officials) then they are probably the ones supporting national government controlled health care aka ObamaCare.
If the feds are so incompetent and corrupt with these prisons, corporations criminal aliens just wait to they control the entire medical and health care delivery and payment infrastructure.
Thank you Terry Gross and Tom Barry for bringing this to light.
Bring back RIGHTS now!
This is happened; the said immigrant’s wife called the police when her car was broken into at night. When the police arrived, they spoke to the wife then reverted their attention to this guy who was standing by and speaking with and accent. The police demanded to see proof that he was in the US legally. The immigrant had been married to his American wife for three years and had two kids. They had registered their marriage with immigration services and were in the process of obtaining their papers.
The immigrant was locked up not as a suspect in car break-in but because he was suspected of being an illegal despite producing their marriage certificate. Years earlier, the immigrant had been out of status on his F1 visa (student) for one semester due to personal problems and the college refused to allow him to continue with his education the following semester. He got married to his then girl friend a few months later.
Immigration now wants him to sign documents for voluntary removal so that they can deport him to his country of origin but he is not willing to sign anything that will separate him for his family. The immigrant was fully supporting his family by working hard but his family has been forced to apply for public assistance because the wife is not able to support the family on her meager salary. The funds that we raised for him were towards his legal fees but we decided to give some of it to the family due to their dire situation before they started receiving public assistance.
I do understand need to stop illegal immigration and follow the law but I what I disagree with is how these people are treated in prison and to what purpose do tax payers benefit if his family will have to depend on welfare when the father is not there. It is the kids (who are US citizens) who will bear the brunt because they are unlikely to succeed in life if the father is deported.
While abuse and cruelty to animals cannot be condoned, like in the Michael Vick case, we cannot turn a blind eye to the systematic abuse of humans in our penal system and pretend that it doesn’t exist when the only reason it is happening is greed.
The "bottom line" and "the extent of the law" have changed dramatically over the course of the last few decades, and they have changed in response to the demands of private profit. That's what this article is about. The criminalization of aliens is not a matter laid out in the Constitution or ordained by god or nature. It is for the benefit of a few corporate and political opportunists. Consider your outrage in that context. You are being used for the electoral and financial gain of unprincipled hacks.
The Constitution protects people in the territory of the United States regardless of citizenship status unless otherwise specified. Everyone should recognize this. Citizenship guarantees a right to vote and to run for office, but little else. In any case, most immigrants, legally present or otherwise, pay their dues. More than two-thirds of "illegals" pay federal income tax. You'll notice that the IRS is one branch of the government that doesn't care a lick about citizenship status.
And finally, on the issue of employment, your legitimate concern is an argument in favor not of incarceration and deportation, but of regularization. That is how you level the playing field. Undocumented workers cannot pursue their fair-labor protections because they fear contact with the government. If they were allowed to work legally, they would gain fair-labor protections and cost just as much to an employer as any other worker. The scheme of incarceration, deportation, and fear that you advocate creates the employment disadvantage you're talking about.